Fox's transfer is a priority for the Spurs: Which 2 franchises can sign him?

The San Antonio Spurs have a problem that many NBA teams would wish to have: too many talented point guards and too many reasons to give them the ball. However, what should be a competitive advantage threatens to become an obstacle for the growth of Dylan Harper and Stephon Castle. The presence of De’Aaron Fox, a proven All-Star and one of the most explosive players in the league, raises an increasingly difficult question to avoid: Does it make sense to keep three point guards who need prominence on the same team when two of them represent the future of the franchise?

San Antonio has reasons to seek a solution as soon as possible. Not because Fox is a bad player or because he has lost value, but precisely because he can still offer a significant return in the market. The Miami Heat and the Toronto Raptors appear as destinations worth considering, while the Spurs must decide whether they want to maximize their options to compete now or build around Victor Wembanyama, Harper, and Castle for the next decade.

De’Aaron Fox is starting to become a luxury the Spurs don’t need

The bet on Fox made sense when San Antonio needed an experienced point guard capable of speeding up their reconstruction. His speed, ability to attack the rim, and experience in important games provided something the team still didn’t have. But the evolution of Harper and Castle is changing the priorities.

Harper, selected with the second pick of the 2025 Draft, has proven that he can take on important responsibilities in high-pressure scenarios. Castle, for his part, has already shown his ability to run the game, defend at a high level, and create advantages. Both have room for growth and fit into the core that the Spurs should protect long-term.

The problem is that all three need to have the ball in their hands to maximize many of their strengths. Coach Mitch Johnson has experimented with a lineup that includes Fox, Harper, and Castle, but doubts about their fit do not disappear simply by putting the best available players together.

In the preseason, Johnson defended the idea of giving the trio opportunities to see how they could complement each other. And there are arguments to give it a try: they are talented players capable of penetrating, passing, and creating advantages. But there is also a clear risk. If Harper and Castle must constantly share playmaking duties with Fox, their development could progress slower than necessary.

The question is not whether Fox can still be important in San Antonio. He can. The question is whether his presence represents the best possible use of a franchise's resources that already has two young point guards with star potential.

To this, the economic factor is added. Fox has over $223 million guaranteed in his contract, which extends through the 2029-30 season. His salary will increase progressively and will coincide with the time when the Spurs will have to face future renewals for their young stars. Shedding that commitment could provide flexibility to complete a championship roster.

However, a trade should not be made at any cost. Fox helped San Antonio compete for the title and remains a top-level player. Precisely for that reason, the goal should be to turn his value into pieces that enhance the team’s balance, not to part with him simply for the sake of minutes.

Miami Heat and Toronto Raptors, two destinations to explore

Miami has reasons to be interested in Fox. The Heat need offensive talent capable of creating advantages in one-on-one situations and relieving the responsibility of Bam Adebayo. The point guard's speed could add a different dimension to Erik Spoelstra's offense, especially in pick-and-roll situations and during critical possessions.

In San Antonio, a deal with Miami could be aimed at finding outside scoring and players capable of defending multiple positions. A proposal published by The Sporting News suggested a trade where the Spurs would receive Tyler Herro and Andrew Wiggins, while the Heat would gain Fox and Keldon Johnson. This is not a confirmed negotiation but a hypothetical scenario that illustrates what type of compensation could make sense for both sides.

Toronto also deserves a call from the Spurs. The Raptors need to strengthen their offensive playmaking, and Fox could provide a constant threat to the rim, as well as experience to compete in the East. However, the operation would need to fit both sports-wise and economically.

A possibility that merits study would be offering Immanuel Quickley and Jakob Poeltl in exchange for Fox. Quickley would give San Antonio another point guard capable of scoring and organizing, with a less substantial contract than Fox, while Poeltl would provide experience and interior depth. The downside of the compensation is that Quickley also needs the ball, and Poeltl would have to fit into a rotation dominated by Wembanyama. Additionally, the exact salary cap feasibility would need to be checked, and terms negotiated; it is not established that this specific package is on the table.

Other published proposals have explored different combinations with Toronto, including a scenario with Brandon Ingram and Poeltl as return pieces. This shows that there are theoretical avenues for negotiation, although it does not guarantee that the Raptors are willing to take on Fox's contract or that San Antonio will find a satisfactory offer.

The conclusion is that the Spurs should, at the very least, listen to offers. Harper and Castle do not need Fox to disappear to become great players, but they do need space to take on responsibilities, make mistakes, and learn. Keeping all three could work, although it is still unproven that it is the ideal formula.

San Antonio does not have to trade Fox tomorrow, but it should ask itself how much it costs to wait. If an offer arises that allows strengthening the roster and giving more prominence to Harper and Castle, prolonging the experiment could be less intelligent than decisively betting on the future.

This is an automatic translation. You can read the original news, El traspaso de Fox es una prioridad para los Spurs: ¿Qué 2 franquicias pueden ficharlo?