Patrick Beverley stirred up debate once again with one of his most striking opinions: he placed Russell Westbrook as the second best point guard in history, just behind Stephen Curry.
The former NBA player explained his ranking bluntly, making it clear that, for him, the only factor that separates Westbrook from the top spot is Curry's accolades and outside shooting.
"For me, he is the second best point guard in history. Obviously, Steph has to be placed ahead for his shooting ability and championships," Beverley stated.
The statement is particularly controversial because it excludes indisputable legends like Magic Johnson or Oscar Robertson from the top 2, names that traditionally dominate any historical list of point guards.
Nevertheless, Beverley defended his stance by highlighting Westbrook's competitive nature, a player he knows well both as an opponent and former teammate.
"His ability to compete is something never seen before," he affirmed.

Westbrook's Legacy
Beyond the controversy, Westbrook's resume supports part of the argument:
- NBA MVP
- Multiple All-Star selections
- One of the few players to average a triple-double in a season (alongside Robertson and Nikola Jokic)
- Presence in the historical top scorers list
However, his lack of championships and inconsistency in playoffs remain key points in the debate about his place in history.
Opinion vs. History
Beverley's ranking reflects more an assessment based on individual impact and competitiveness than on collective achievements or traditional legacy.
And therein lies the core of the discussion: while some prioritize titles and efficiency, others value intensity, statistics, and the ability to dominate a game like few in history.
As is often the case with this type of statements, the debate is on.
This news is an automatic translation. You can read the original news, Patrick Beverley: "Russell Westbrook es el segundo mejor base de la historia"