Madrid wins without three-pointers: pace and penetration in the debut
The Real Madrid triumphed over Unicaja 89-87 in their debut in the Liga Endesa with a contradictory offensive performance. They shot 26 three-pointers with only six successful (23.1%), but scored 89 points and generated 116.4 points for every hundred possessions. The key lay in an attack based on rhythm, penetration, and offensive rebounding.
The Real Madrid showcased a clear offensive identity in their debut that transcends perimeter numbers. With only a 23% success rate on three-pointers, the team coached by Pedro Martínez managed a production of 116.4 points per hundred possessions, demonstrating that the attack has multiple paths to the basket. This mismatch between external inefficiency and overall effectiveness is likely the most revealing statistic of the Madrid start.
A team that rejects slow play
The first indicator that structures everything else is the 76.5 possessions per forty minutes. This is a high pace that does not necessarily mean shooting within six seconds, but rather exiting the rebound without pauses, quickly taking the ball from the baseline, and reaching the opposing side before the defense is fully set. This plan rests on two concrete foundations: Facundo Campazzo and Théo Maledon distributed twelve of the team's twenty assists —seven for the Frenchman and five for the Argentine— taking charge of generating the first offensive advantage. What happens next depends directly on how they resolve that initial situation.
The high pace is not coincidental. It reflects a philosophy where constant movement disorients defenses and creates opportunities before the opponent can reorganize. Campazzo and Maledon are the conductors of this orchestra, generating advantages that the team then exploits in various ways.
Penetration as the central axis of the attack
The shooting numbers leave no room for ambiguity. Madrid took 46 two-point shots compared to only 26 three-pointers, making 58.7% of the former. They also stepped to the free-throw line 22 times, with a 77.3% success rate. The attack was, therefore, one of penetration, continuation, and interior play. The FTr of 30.6 confirms this, and the distribution of those free throws reveals even more, as they come from different positions. Maledon finished 6/6 from the line, Campazzo 5/6, Damian Jones 2/4, Alberto Abalde 2/2, Gabriel Deck 1/2, and Pradilla 1/2. It is not a team that pressures the rim from a single location.
This distribution is significant because it shows that the pressure on the defense comes from multiple points. There is not a single advantage generator, but rather a system where different players attack the paint and generate contact.
Campazzo and Maledon: 32 points and 12 assists
The duo of point guards does not only distribute. Maledon scored 17 points, had seven assists, a perfect 6/6 at the free-throw line, and a valuation of 23; Campazzo added 15 points and five assists. Together they totaled 32 points, 12 assists, and eleven free throws. This last number provides the most information: the point guards do not play the pick-and-roll solely to pass, but rather attack the advantage, reach the paint, and force the defense to decide with physical contact. Maledon, in particular, combines scoring and creating in a ratio that makes him the central piece of the attack.
Two interiors with complementary profiles
In the paint, Madrid has two profiles that do not resemble each other. Damian Jones scored 8 points with a perfect 3/3 from two-point range and four free throws in just 15:48, showing the typical performance of an interior who receives the ball close to the rim and finishes vertically. Walter Tavares had a less smooth night offensively —2/5 in two, four points— but grabbed eleven rebounds, three of which were offensive, and blocked two shots. His influence comes from another angle: size, rebounding, and deterrent presence.
The combinations of Campazzo or Maledon with Tavares or Jones are, therefore, the skeleton of the team's pick-and-roll game, with two different finishes to choose from depending on the moment. When vertical finishing is needed, Jones is available. When rebounding and physical presence matter, Tavares is the answer.
Offensive rebounding as a lifeline
This is where the most defining trait of Madrid's performance lies. The team finished with 13 offensive rebounds and 29 defensive rebounds, totaling 42, with a 34.2% offensive rebounding rate. They recover approximately one in every three missed shots. It is precisely what allowed them to win a game with a 23% three-point rate. The distribution also does not depend on a single player: Tavares grabbed eleven rebounds, Deck eight —six of them defensive, facilitating fast breaks after—, Luwawu-Cabarrot five, and Pradilla three.
Put in terms of identity: this is a team that wants to finish possessions physically. If they miss, they fight for a second chance. This behavior is the safety net that allowed Madrid to win despite perimeter inefficiency.
Ball security also sustains this offensive production. An 11.9% turnover rate —eleven in the entire game— is low for a team playing at 76.5 possessions, as high pace usually brings errors. The twenty assists leave an AST% of 60.6%: six out of ten baskets come after a pass. It is not a team tied to one-on-one play. There is individual creation from Campazzo and Maledon, but the intent appears to be creating an advantage and moving the ball from there.
The three-pointer as a consequence, not a goal
The 3PAr stands at 36.1%: just over a third of their field goals were three-pointers, a proportion that is not high for contemporary basketball. The attempts were spread out —six from Luwawu-Cabarrot, five from Campazzo, four from Pradilla, three from Abalde, three from Deck, two from Maledon— indicating shots that originate from a prior advantage rather than an attack built around the three-point line. The problem of the game was not generating them. It was making them.
This detail is relevant because it shows that Madrid is not trying to force the three-pointer as a starting point. Outside shots come when the attack has created an advantage, not as an initial solution. When those shots start to fall more consistently, the offensive production will become even more dangerous.
What the debut does show is a clear hint about where this Madrid wants to thrive: in the pace, in penetration, at the free-throw line, and in offensive rebounding. The perimeter, when it comes, will add. In the capital, they will rely on those 26 three-pointers attempted starting to go in more frequently in the upcoming competition matches.
This is an automatic translation. You can read the original news, Madrid gana sin triples: ritmo y penetración en el debut